Meta-Analysis of a Complete Micro-PK Database from the LMU Lab
  • About
  • Experiments
  • Change of Evidence
  • Meta-Analysis
  1. Overview
  • Overview
  • Measures

Change of Evidence

Last update: 23 October 2026

Change of Evidence measures compare the Bayesian evidence for an effect over the course of data collection to those of monte-carlo simulations. They can reveal unusual changes in evidence which can be the consequence of the rise and decline of volatile effects.

Combined
Max BF
BF Energy
FFT Amp.sum
Study Effect expected N CoE p Value (n) p p p Direction Lab/Online
Loving Kind βœ” 171 0.127 4.16 (n=32) 0.113 0.154 0.12 greater 🏠
Prayer βœ” 431 0.541 1.44 (n=17) 0.481 0.723 0.481 greater 🌍
Monks T1 Exp βœ” 23 0.123 1.98 (n=22) 0.139 0.11 0.123 greater 🏠
Monks T1 Con βœ– 29 0.924 1 (n=1) 1 0.807 0.992 greater 🏠
Monks T2 Exp βœ” 23 0.16 1.74 (n=14) 0.169 0.139 0.177 greater 🏠
Monks T2 Con βœ– 29 0.471 1.18 (n=7) 0.44 0.472 0.504 greater 🏠
Meditation T1 βœ– 40 0.982 1 (n=1) 1 0.949 1 greater 🌍
Meditation T2 βœ” 48 0.332 1.74 (n=4) 0.248 0.559 0.312 greater 🌍
Sound preference βœ” 70 0.387 1.27 (n=53) 0.502 0.306 0.401 greater 🏠
All-will-be-good βœ” 38 0.349 1.77 (n=5) 0.293 0.47 0.326 greater 🏠
One-armed Bandit βœ” 40 0.034 4.15 (n=24) 0.053 0.023 0.037 greater 🏠
Coin Toss βœ” 40 0.394 1.15 (n=17) 0.494 0.311 0.42 greater 🏠
Incongruence Exp βœ” 236 0.021 10.72 (n=153) 0.034 0.014 0.023 greater 🌍
Incongruence Con βœ– 271 0.229 2.1 (n=125) 0.289 0.171 0.265 greater 🌍
Smokers 1 Exp βœ” 122 0.006 66.06 (n=122) 0.007 0.006 0.006 different 🏠
Smokers 1 Con βœ– 132 0.998 1 (n=1) 1 0.993 1 different 🏠
Smokers 2 Exp βœ” 175 0.065 10.19 (n=7) 0.055 0.115 0.052 less 🏠
Smokers 2 Con βœ– 220 0.091 6.97 (n=10) 0.08 0.111 0.086 less 🏠
Smokers 3 βœ” 203 0.266 1.89 (n=3) 0.248 0.259 0.294 less 🏠
Psyscanner Style 1 Exp βœ” 1400 0.024 12.92 (n=825) 0.041 0.017 0.024 greater 🌍
Psyscanner Style 1 Con βœ– 1003 0.611 1.12 (n=2) 0.735 0.449 0.755 greater 🌍
Psyscanner Style 2 Exp βœ” 1308 0.205 3.2 (n=355) 0.234 0.185 0.202 greater 🌍
Psyscanner Style 2 Con βœ– 1095 0.058 7.84 (n=936) 0.087 0.042 0.06 greater 🌍
Psyscanner Style 3 Exp βœ” 1462 0.275 2.39 (n=187) 0.341 0.241 0.261 greater 🌍
Psyscanner Style 3 Con βœ– 941 0.287 3.72 (n=17) 0.181 0.637 0.298 greater 🌍
Relaxation βœ” 12571 0.104 7.44 (n=380) 0.11 0.11 0.093 greater 🌍
Priming 1 Exp βœ” 4092 0.021 28.78 (n=1680) 0.023 0.019 0.02 greater 🌍
Priming 1 Con βœ– 4092 0.698 1.38 (n=58) 0.648 0.687 0.768 greater 🌍
Priming 2 Exp βœ” 2063 0.844 1.15 (n=21) 0.767 0.903 0.876 greater 🌍
Priming 2 Con βœ– 2063 0.922 1 (n=1) 1 0.801 0.995 greater 🌍
Priming 3 Exp βœ” 6099 0.85 1.01 (n=28) 0.868 0.827 0.855 greater 🌍
Priming 3 Con βœ– 6099 0.971 1 (n=1) 1 0.949 0.964 greater 🌍
Priming 4 Exp βœ” 4060 0.667 1.65 (n=11) 0.539 0.877 0.666 greater 🌍
Priming 4 Con βœ– 4060 0.717 1.56 (n=5) 0.562 0.972 0.727 greater 🌍
Erotic Images 1 βœ” 241 0.388 1.39 (n=111) 0.492 0.288 0.449 greater 🌍
Erotic Images 2 βœ” 678 0.079 5.24 (n=363) 0.111 0.053 0.101 greater 🌍
Smokers Priming Exp βœ” 38 0.25 1.76 (n=4) 0.233 0.259 0.259 greater 🏠
Smokers Priming Con βœ– 38 0.223 1.88 (n=6) 0.209 0.223 0.238 greater 🏠
Sobjectivity 1 βœ– 898 0.669 1.41 (n=2) 0.526 0.83 0.724 greater 🌍
Sobjectivity 2 βœ– 986 0.959 1 (n=1) 1 0.922 0.959 greater 🌍
Sobjectivity 3 βœ– 1503 0.011 56.51 (n=56) 0.008 0.052 0.008 greater 🌍
Epsi Correlation Condition A βœ– 2052 0.555 1.6 (n=78) 0.486 0.683 0.532 greater 🌍
Epsi Correlation Condition B βœ– 2052 0.384 2.47 (n=8) 0.299 0.685 0.332 greater 🌍
Robots βœ” 34 0.128 2.28 (n=13) 0.15 0.113 0.125 greater 🌍
SchrΓΆdingers Cat Hope βœ” 285 0.995 1 (n=1) 1 0.986 1 greater 🌍
SchrΓΆdingers Cat Baseline βœ” 285 0.241 1.87 (n=104) 0.327 0.172 0.279 greater 🌍
Desire βœ” 201 0.346 1.45 (n=14) 0.44 0.282 0.352 greater 🌍
Stories βœ” 766 0.186 2.18 (n=207) 0.305 0.129 0.195 greater 🌍
Willpower βœ” 703 0.049 15.68 (n=58) 0.037 0.085 0.045 greater 🌍
Baseline 1 Lucky βœ” 801 0.024 13.21 (n=627) 0.032 0.02 0.023 less 🌍
Baseline 1 Unlucky βœ” 725 0.916 1 (n=1) 1 0.81 0.96 greater 🌍
Baseline 2 βœ” 2094 0.263 4.04 (n=6) 0.161 0.615 0.28 less 🌍
Note: CoE p is the harmonic mean of the three component p-values. All p-values are the share of 1,000 null simulations with an equal or more extreme value.
Measures
 

Β© 2024-2026 Dr. Moritz Dechamps